online ISSN 2415-3176
print ISSN 1609-6371
logoExperimental and Clinical Physiology and Biochemistry
  • 8 of 13
Up
ECPB 2019, 85(1): 52–57
https://doi.org/10.25040/ecpb2019.01.052
Research articles

Application of air Pouch Model for Evaluation the Ability of Immune Cells to Sequester Foreign Nano- and Microparticles

S.YA. PARYZHAK, T.I. DUMYCH, G.I. BILA, R.O. BILYY
Abstract

Wide application of nano- and microparticles requires new effective approaches for evaluation of interaction of micro- and nanoparticles with body tissues. Human macrophage system has developed some mechanisms for recognition, engulfment and elimination by oxidation/digestion of crystals and nanoparticles. However, this approach does not work in the case of hydrophobic, inert or sharp edged particles, usually resulting in some damaging of engulfing macrophages and stimulating recruitment of neutrophils. The latter was shown to form neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) being able to surround, sequester and eventually isolate nanoparticles, preventing their further contact with the body. Tracking of nano- and microparticles is often challenging, because it requires radioactive labeling or the use of other complicated methods of detection. Air pouch model is an artificial cavity, usually induced on the back of experimental mice by injection of sterile air. In some time it becomes widely populated with different immune cells and was effectively used for many years with the aim to study different biological processes like pharmacokinetics, angiogenesis or cell migration. We have recently demonstrated the use of the air pouch model for analysis the sequestration of nanodiamonds, polystyrene nanoparticles or carbon nanoparticles.

In the current work we described the methodological part related to the use of the air pouch model for evaluation of immune cells’ ability to sequester injected foreign particles. As examples we used aluminium oxide nanowires, aluminium hydroxide and graphene nanoparticles.

The formers are often injected to the body during vaccination process as adjuvants, and were recently shown to be entrapped by NETs at the place of injection, while the latter is a very resistant example of carbon pollutants, which are becoming a serious danger during forest fires, caused by climate changes and other factors.

On the basis of histopathological studies, the formation of air pouch was found to be ideal on the 6th day based on mechanical barrier and blood vessels, and the infiltration of immune cells was optimal 24 hours after the injection of the tested sample. Thus, the analysis of nanoparticle interaction can be done within 7 days. Significant numbers of eosinophils, monocytes and mastocytes, involved in the development of the inflammatory process, were detected inside the air pouch. Neutrophils in the air pouch were forming NETs. We observed entrapment of both γ-Al2O3 NWs and Al(OH)3 compounds and the formation of aggregated NETs around them. However, micro-capillary damage and edema were significantly less visible for γ-Al2O3 NWs than for commercial alum. At the same time the inert carbon nanomaterial graphene oxide was not sequestered or phagocytosed by any of the cell types infiltrating the air pouch cavity and 24 hours post-injection was still filling all space of air pouch cavity.

The proposed approach can be effectively utilized to study interactions of immune cells with other particulate nanomatter.

Recieved: 05.03.2019

Keywords: air pouch model, adjuvants, micro- and nanoparticles, neutrophil extracellular traps

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 1.73M

References
  1. 1. Nakayama M. Macrophage Recognition of Crystals and Nanoparticles. Front Immunol. 2018;9. doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00103
  2. 2. Biermann MHC, Podolska MJ, Knopf J, Reinwald C, Weidner D, Maueröder C, et al. Oxidative burst-dependent NETosis is implicated in the resolution of necrosis-associated sterile inflammation. Front Immunol. 2016;7(DEC). doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00557
  3. 3. Okudaira M, Schwarz J. Histoplasma capsulatum infection in rat air pouch. Arch Pathol. 1962;74:239-43.
  4. 4. Sedgwick AD, Sin YM, Edwards JCW, Willoughby DA. Increased inflammatory reactivity in newly formed lining tissue. J Pathol. 1983;141(4):483-95. doi.org/10.1002/path.1711410406
  5. 5. Edwards JCW, Sedgwick AD, Willoughby DA. The formation of a structure with the features of synovial lining by subcutaneous injection of air: Anin vivo tissue culture system. J Pathol. 1981;134(2):147-56. doi.org/10.1002/path.1711340205
  6. 6. Sin YM, Sedgwick AD, Moore A, Willoughby DA. Studies on the clearance of calcium pyrophosphate crystals from facsimile synovium. Ann Rheum Dis. 1984;43(3):487-92. doi.org/10.1136/ard.43.3.487
  7. 7. Dalhoff A, Frank G, Luckhaus G. The granuloma pouch: an in vivo model for pharmacokinetic and chemotherapeutic investigations. I. Biochemical and histological characterization. Infection. 10(6):354-60. doi.org/10.1007/BF01642299
  8. 8. Hashida R, Chiba K, Yamatsu I, Katayama K. Collagenase production in the exudate of a novel adjuvant-induced air pouch inflammation model in rats. Agents Actions. 1991;34(1-2):242-3.
  9. 9. Cronstein BN, Naime D, Ostad E. The antiinflammatory mechanism of methotrexate. Increased adenosine release at inflamed sites diminishes leukocyte accumulation in an in vivo model of inflammation. J Clin Invest. 1993;92(6):2675-82. doi.org/10.1172/JCI116884
  10. 10. Martin SW, Stevens AJ, Brennan BS, Reis ML, Gifford LA, Rowland M et al. Regional drug delivery I: permeability characteristics of the rat 6-day-old air pouch model of inflammation. Pharm Res. 1995;12(12):1980-6.
  11. 11. Eteraf-Oskouei T, Allahyari S, Akbarzadeh-Atashkhosrow A, Delazar A, Pashaii M, Gan SH et al. Methanolic Extract of Ficus carica Linn. Leaves Exerts Antiangiogenesis Effects Based on the Rat Air Pouch Model of Inflammation. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015;2015:760405. doi.org/10.1155/2015/760405
  12. 12. Sin YM, Sedgwick AD, Chea EP, Willoughby DA. Mast cells in newly formed lining tissue during acute inflammation: A six day air pouch model in the mouse. Ann Rheum Dis. 1986;45(10):873-7. doi.org/10.1136/ard.45.10.873
  13. 13. Muñoz LE, Bilyy R, Biermann MHC, Kienhöfer D, Maueröder C, Hahn J et al. Nanoparticles size-dependently initiate self-limiting NETosis-driven inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 [cited 2017 Nov 5];113(40):E5856-65. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602230113
  14. 14. Dumych T, Paryzhak S, Peshkova S, Bila G, Lutsyk O, Bilyy P et al. How Can the Death of Cells Be Useful For a Human Body? Exp Clin Physiol Biochem. 2018;2018(2):77-85. doi.org/10.25040/ecpb2018.02.077
  15. 15. Paryzhak S, Dumych T, Bilyy R. Pathways of neutrophil activation by natural hydrophobic nanocrystals. Exp Clin Physiol Biochem. 2018;2018(1):68-73. doi.org/10.25040/ecpb2018.01.068
  16. 16. Bilyy R, Fedorov V, Vovk V, Leppkes M, Dumych T, Chopyak V et al. Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Form a Barrier between Necrotic and Viable Areas in Acute Abdominal Inflammation. Front Immunol. 2016;7(OCT). doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2016.00424
  17. 17. Papayannopoulos V, Zychlinsky A. NETs: a new strategy for using old weapons. Trends Immunol. 2009;30(11):513-21. doi.org/10.1016/j.it.2009.07.011
  18. 18. Stephen J, Scales HE, Benson RA, Erben D, Garside P, Brewer JM. Neutrophil swarming and extracellular trap formation play a significant role in Alum adjuvant activity. NPJ vaccines. 2017;2(1):1. doi.org/10.1038/s41541-016-0001-5
  19. 19. Sun B, Pokhrel S, Dunphy DR, Zhang H, Ji Z, Wang X et al. Reduction of Acute Inflammatory Effects of Fumed Silica Nanoparticles in the Lung by Adjusting Silanol Display through Calcination and Metal Doping. ACS Nano. 2015;9(9):9357-72.doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.5b03443
  20. 20. Li X, Hufnagel S, Xu H, Valdes SA, Thakkar SG, Cui Z et al. Aluminum (Oxy)Hydroxide Nanosticks Synthesized in Bicontinuous Reverse Microemulsion Have Potent Vaccine Adjuvant Activity. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2017;9(27):22893-901. doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b03965
  21. 21. Sun B, Ji Z, Liao Y-P, Wang M, Wang X, Dong J et al. Engineering an Effective Immune Adjuvant by Designed Control of Shape and Crystallinity of Aluminum Oxyhydroxide Nanoparticles. ACS Nano. 2013;7(12):10834-49. doi.org/10.1021/nn404211j
  22. 22. Schauer C, Janko C, Munoz LE, Zhao Y, Kienhöfer D, Frey B et al. Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps limit inflammation by degrading cytokines and chemokines. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):511-7. doi.org/10.1038/nm.3547
  23. 23. Desai J, Foresto-Neto O, Honarpisheh M, Steiger S, Nakazawa D, Popper B et al. Particles of different sizes and shapes induce neutrophil necroptosis followed by the release of neutrophil extracellular trap-like chromatin. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):15003. doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15106-0
  24. 24. Schauer C, Janko C, Munoz LELE, Zhao YY, Kienhöfer D, Frey B et al. Aggregated neutrophil extracellular traps limit inflammation by degrading cytokines and chemokines. Nat Med. 2014;20(5):511-7. doi.org/10.1038/nm.3547
  25. 25. Paryzhak S, Dumych T, Peshkova S, Bila E, Lutsyk A, Barras A et al. Interaction of 4 allotropic modifications of carbon nanoparticles with living tissues. Ukr Biochem J. 2019;91:accepted. oi.org/10.15407/ubj91.02.041


Програмування - Roman.im