online ISSN 2415-3176
print ISSN 1609-6371
logoExperimental and Clinical Physiology and Biochemistry
J. 2016, 73(1): 62–68
https://doi.org/10.25040/ecpb2016.01.062

Clinical physiology and biochemistry


Bone Remodeling under Various Vibration Parameters: Current State of Problem

KOSTYSHYN N., GZREGOTSKY M.
Abstract

The article provides a literature overview on the impact of different frequencies and amplitudes vibration on the body and also in bone. The ability of vibrating stimulus affect on the physiological remodeling of bone, and the feasibility of using high-frequency low amplitude vibrations in prevention of osteopenic syndrome and osteoporosis were investigated. It was noted that osteopenic syndrome and osteoporosis developed rapidly in terms of production activities.

Adapting to extreme factors action is associated with the restructuring of its regulatory system, which takes shape of pathophysiological responses. Tissue damage, dystrophic and degenerative processes may change the structure of bone cells, giving them the antigenic properties. Bone tissue has a key role in the complex system of mechanisms regulating homoeostasis of electrolytes, including calcium and phosphorus. Vibration can change the structure and functional status of bone tissue. This stress factor leads to imbalance of ionic composition of body fluids, which violates electrolyte transport between the extracellular space and cells of the body. Modern laboratory methods allow controlling a significant number of biochemical and immunological bone metabolism parameters.

The main aspects to consider are the following: level of calcitonin, parathyroid hormone, macroelements (calcium and phosphorus) in biological fluids, osteocalcin in plasma, Procolagen type I N-terminal propeptide, Cros-lined telopeptide I type collagen and others.

Development of vibration disease and osteoporosis have common pathogenetic features associated with activation of the immune system, hyper production of pro-inflammatory and insufficients of anti-inflammatory cytokines, imbalances in the RANKL/RANK/OPGsystem, which activates osteoclastogenesis and increases bone resorption.

International Organization for Standardization (ISO) introduced health standards, normalizing effect on the human body vibration (ISO 5349-1, 2001). It includes frequency-weighting curve which gives the highest value of low-frequency high-amplitude local vibration (≤ 16 Hz) and much less for the medium and high frequency vibration. Nevertheless, epidemiological and experimental studies conducted in Europe and the USA indicated that the risk of vibration disease with osteopenic syndrome occurs mainly in workers contacting with the medium and high-frequency vibration.

The scientific literature review suggests that there is not enough data about the impact of vibration of the bone remodeling processes.

There is enough data to conduct the effect of the immune system in the pathogenesis of osteopenic syndrome under vibration stimulus. And scierntists are aware of unproven anabolic impact of high-frequency low amplitude vibrations on bone remodelling process. These studies are topical as they give the ability to detect violations of bone remodeling in persons contacting with vibration and increase the effectiveness of early diagnosis of osteopenic syndrome and osteoporosis.

Article Received 30/11/2015

Keywords: vibration disease, bone remodeling, mineral metabolism

Full text: PDF (Ukr) 0.96M

References
  1. 1.Кundiiev Y, Nagornaya А. Dynamics of occupational morbidity in Ukraine and experience of the institute for occupational health of NAN Ukraine. Ukr. J. Occup. Health. 2013;4(37):11-22.
  2. 2. Kapustnik V, Sukhonos N. The role of bioelemental homeostasis changes in patients suffering from vibration disease combined with hypertension disease.Odessa Medical Journal. 2013;4:74-78.
  3. 3. Korobchanskiy V, Novikova I, Gerasymenko O. Biochemical criteria of prenosologic and early diagnostics of vibrating illness under influence of local vibration.J. Med. today and tomorrow. 2011;4:139-144.
  4. 4. Mazur V. Comparative assessment of methods of diagnostics of vibration disease and hands vegeto-sensory polyneuropathy in miners.Ukrainian journal of occupational health problems. 2011;3:33-37.
  5. 5. Melnyk O, Riabokon A, Popova T. Health of workers of gas company. J. Med. today and tomorrow.2013;3:113-117.
  6. 6. Kundiiev Y, Trakhtenberg I, Chernyuk V, NagornayaA.Occupational medicine in the modern stage. Cientific Journal of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. 2014;1:47м55.
  7. 7. Chernyuk V, Abrahamovych O, Mazur V, Peleshko O. Early diagnosis and pharmacoprophylaxis of vibration disease and hands vegeto-sensory polyneuropathy among miners of colliersin Lviv-Volunregion. Ukrainian journal of occupational medicine. 2014;1(38):53-59.
  8. 8. Hook Y, Magomedov O, Zyma A, Kincha-Polishchuk T. Remodeling of bone tissue at osteogenesis imperfecta: undecided and clarified issues and prospects of their decision. Trauma. 2013;6(14):32-38.
  9. 9. Povorozniuk V, Orlik T, Grigoriev N. Osteoporotic fractures in Ukrainian women: relationship with age, as bone and vertebral pain syndrome. The journal Bol. Sustavy. Podzvonochnik. 2011;4:4-11.
  10. 10. Sova S, Yavorovsky O, Shkurko G. Hygienic assessment of the pulse local vibration and physical cofactors of the industrial environment on the working places of fitter-rivots and locksmith-fitters of the aviation enterprises (to the problem of hygienic setting). Environment and Health. 2014;2:30-35. 11. Sukhonos N. Distribution of macro-elements in biological media with a combination of vibration and hypertension. J. Med. today and tomorrow. 2013;3:170-175.
  11. 12. Beck B, Norling T. The effect of 8 mos of twice-weekly low- or higher intensity whole body vibration on risk factors for postmenopausal hip fracture.J. Phys. Med. Reabil. 2010;89(12):997-1009. doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181f71063
  12. 13. Christiansen B, Silva M. The effect of varying magnitudes of whole- body vibration on several skeletal sites in mice. Ann. Biomed. 2006;34:1149-1156. doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9133-5
  13. 14. Slatkovska L, Alibhai S, Beyene J, Cheung A. Effect of whole-body vibration on BMD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int. 2010;21(12):1968-1980. doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1228-z
  14. 15. Wenger K, Freeman J, Fulzele S, Immel D. Effect of whole-body vibration on bone properties in ageing mice. Bone. 2010;47:746-755. doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.07.014
  15. 16. Stengel S, Kemmler W, Engelke K, Kalender W. Effects of whole body vibration on bone mineral density and falls: results of the randomized controlled ELVIS study with postmenopausal women. Osteoporosis Int. 2011;22(1):317-325. doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1215-4
  16. 17. Ruan X, Jin F, Liu Y, Peng Z, Sun Y. Effects of vibration therapy on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Chin. Med. J.2008;121(13):1155-1158.
  17. 18. Slatkovska L, Alibhai S, Beyene J, Hu H, Demaras A, Cheung A. Effect of 12 months of whole-body vibration therapy on bone density and structure in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial. Ann Internalnal Medicine. 2011;155(10):668-679. doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00005
  18. 19. Wenger K, Freeman J, Fulzele S. Effect of whole-body vibration on bone properties in ageing mice.Bone. 2010;47(4):746-755. doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2010.07.014
  19. 20. Krainak K, Riley D, Wu J, McDowell T. Frequency-dependent effects of vibration on physiological systems: experimental with animals and other human surrogates. Industrial health. 2012;50:343-353. doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.MS1378
  20. 21. Heaver C, Goonetilleke K, Ferguson H, Shiralkar S. Hand-arm vibration syndrome: a common occupational hazard in industrialized countries. J. Hand. Surg. Eur. 2011;36:54-63. doi.org/10.1177/1753193410396636
  21. 22. ISO / ISO 5349-1. Mechanical Vibration - Measurement and evaluation of human exposure to hand transmitted vibration, Part 1: General Requirements Medicine // Mechanical Vibration and Shock; 2001. 24.
  22. 23. Judex S, Rubin C. Is bone formation induced by high-frequency mechanical signals modulated by muscle activity? J. Musculoskelet. Neuronal. Interact; 2010;10(1):3-11.
  23. 24. Judex S, Lei X, Han D, Rubin C. Low-magnitude mechanical signals that stimulate bone formation in the ovariectomized rat are dependent on the applied frequency but not on the strain magnitude. J. Biomech. 2007;40(6):1333-1339. doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.014
  24. 25. Rauch F,Sievanen H, Boonen S. International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. Reporting whole-body vibration intervention studies: recommendations of the International Society of Musculoskeletal and Neuronal Interactions. J. Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2010;10(3):193-198.
  25. 26. Abdollahi M, Larijani B, Rahimi R, Salari P.Role of oxidative stress in osteoporosis. Therapy. 2005;2:787-796. doi.org/10.2217/14750708.2.5.787
  26. 27. Rubin C, Xu G, Judex S. The anabolic activity of bone tissue, suppressed by disuse, is normalized by brief exposure to extremely low-magnitude mechanical stimuli.FASEB Journal. 2011;15(12):2225-2229. doi.org/10.1096/fj.01-0166com
  27. 28. Seibel M, Robbins S, Bilezikian J. Dynamics of bone and cartilage metabolism. California:Academic press; 2006. 919.
  28. 29. Scuffham P, Chaplin S, Legood R. Incidence and costs of unintentional falls in older people in the United Kingdom.J. Epidemiologycal Community Health. 2008;57(9):740-744. doi.org/10.1136/jech.57.9.740
  29. 30. Silvestrini G, Ballanti P, Patacchioli F, Leopizzi M. Detection of osteoprotegerin (OPG) and its ligand (RANKL) mRNA and protein in femur and tibia of the rat. J.MolecularHistology. 2005;36:59-67. doi.org/10.1007/s10735-004-3839-1
  30. 31. Totosy de Zepetnek J,Giangregorio L, Craven B. Whole-body vibration as potential intervention for people with low bone mineral density and osteoporosis: a review.J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2009;46(4):529-542. doi.org/10.1682/JRRD.2008.09.0136
  31. 32. Rubin C, Pope M, Fritton J, Magnusson M, Hansson T, McLeod K. Transmissibility of 15-hertz to 35-hertz vibrations to the human hip and lumbar spine: determining the physiologic feasibility of delivering low- level anabolic mechanical stimuli to skeletal regions at greatest risk of fracture because of osteoporosis. Spine. 2008;28(23):2621-2627. doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000102682.61791.C9
  32. 33. Abercromby A, Amonette W, Layne C, McFarlin B, Hinman M. Vibration exposure and biodynamic responses during whole-body vibration training. Med. Sci. Sports Exercises. 2007;39:1794-1800. doi.org/10.1249/mss.0b013e3181238a0f
  33. 34. Wysocki A, Butler M, Shamliyan T, Kane R. Whole-body vibration therapy for osteoporosis: state of the science. Ann. Internal. Medicine. 2011;155(10):680-686. doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00006
  34. 35. Santos-Filho S, Meyer P, Ronzio O, Bonelli L, Fonseca A. Whole body vibration exercise: what do you know about scientific interest? Fiep. Bull. 2010;80:875-878.


Програмування - Roman.im | QR-Code Generator